I am often sent anti-GNM videos and articles to review or give my opinion on. It can be quite repetitive, as there are always common denominators between the hit pieces, so I thought I’d compile this in addition to my Researching with Discernment article.
Always use discernment!
The Biological Laws creates a huge paradigm shift (and also raises your consciousness, according to muscle-testing). This awakening of your mind to truth can be challenging for some, and the transition can leave people quite vulnerable as they unlearn what they were brought up to believe as true.
There are many articles that prey on this vulnerability in an attempt to turn people away from waking up.
Anti-German New Medicine (GNM) hit pieces, whether they are skeptical blogs, Substack rants (like Demetra Gray’s “The Culty Fraud”) or mainstream medical gatekeepers desperately clinging to their outdated, fear-mongering paradigm, have become extremely predictable, using strawman distortions, ad hominem attacks, cherry-picked debunking, and lots of fear propaganda. Whether this is to protect the trillion-dollar sickness industry, or as a projection of their own cognitive dissonance (either from extensive training into mainstream science or inability to accept responsibility for their own health), lives are at stake when people are scared away from true understanding.
They all misrepresent Dr. Ryke Geerd Hamer’s Five Biological Laws as some vague “emotional trauma causes disease” woo-woo, all the while ignoring the precise, verifiable science. This is also true of many AI platforms who unanimously claim “emotional conflicts”. Let’s analyse these tired attacks comprehensively, because the flaws are universal (and I will be addressing Demetra Gray’s piece in some more detail).
The core strawman – rife in anything anti-GNM: is claiming GNM boils down to “emotional shocks” or “trauma” causing illness, often lumping it with mind-body ideas (like Sarno’s tension myositis) before dismissing it as tenuous.
Hogwash!
Dr. Hamer defined the trigger as a biological conflict shock (DHS -Dirk Hamer Syndrome): an acute, dramatic, unexpected survival-level event hitting simultaneously on psyche, brain, and organ. This is tied to evolutionary biology (e.g., territorial loss, separation, self-devaluation, death-fright etc.).
It’s NOT chronic stress, and NOT vague emotions.
Every “dis-ease” is a Meaningful Special Biological Program (SBS) adapting intelligently in two phases: conflict-active (sympathicotonia: cell proliferation or ulceration for survival advantage) and healing (vagotonia: repair with inflammation, microbes, fatigue).
Critics reduce this to fuzzy psychology, making it much easier to mock – but this is pure strawman fallacy.
On “scientific” debunking: They love claiming Hamer Foci (concentric rings on brain CTs correlating exactly to conflicts and organs) are mere “camera artifacts” or “glitches.” This is laughable cherry-picking – if they were artifacts, they’d appear randomly in fixed camera positions across every scan – same place regardless of patient. But authentic Hamer Foci stay in the exact brain relay when the patient is shifted laterally or vertically (as tested and confirmed), proving they’re biological, not technical. Siemens’ 1989 document confirms that this method is how to distinguish real structures from artifacts.
Early radiologists dismissed rings as glitches because they didn’t understand them—until Hamer correlated them perfectly. Thousands of verified cases show 100% psyche-brain-organ synchrony. No exceptions. Dismissing this as “artifact” is confirmation bias from those refusing to examine the evidence.
Ad hominem overload: Every attack drags up Dr Hamer’s revoked licence, imprisonments, or alleged late-life antisemitic statements (which is taken out of context – see my article Controversies Abound). Classic poisoning the well.
The Laws stand independently.
Dr Hamer’s personal tragedies (his son’s death triggering his own conflict) don’t invalidate verifications in clinics and universities (e.g., Trnava 1998, multiple earlier audits with 90%+ survival in terminal cases (confirmed in a court of law) vs. conventional’s dismal rates).
The suppression is political as it threatens chemo/radiation profits.
The “cult” accusation: this is the main theme of Demtra Gray’s Substack article linked above – and it is hysterical false equivalence. This is seen in her applying Lifton’s criteria (sacred science), claiming that GNM has “loading language”, and promoting a “heads-I-win-tails-you-lose” scenario.
This is pure Projection.
Leader worship? None required; Dr Hamer demanded independent verification, not faith. We fully respect Dr Hamer, yes – but follow blindly? No. Dr Fauci on the other hand……
Loading Language? Terms like DHS/SBS are used for a precise description that encapsulated Dr Hamer’s true intention that cannot be misconstrued – not mind-control jargon.
“Unfalsifiable”? Conventional medicine blames “genetics/lifestyle/bad luck” for failures while taking credit for successes:
This is the real “heads-I-win, tails-you-lose” scenario.
Granted, a small handful of teachers or paid groups might act a little “culty”, being dismissive of all others and everything else affecting our health -that happens everywhere in any topic – even the mainstream medical establishment (“Trust the Science” ring any bells?). But the Laws themselves ARE the pure science: no isolation, no exploitation required, total empowerment through understanding.
Compare this to the real cult: which is the pharma-medical complex, with its enforced dogma, billions in coercion, and iatrogenic injuries and deaths that very few dare to question.
Microbes as “enemies,” metastasis as real, diseases as “errors” – all debunked by the Biological Laws. Microbes are healing allies; no metastasis (“secondary cancers” are from new shocks, often diagnosis panic); the body adapts brilliantly and never malfunctions randomly.
These articles aren’t sincere skepticism -they’re propaganda to scare people back to toxic, failing treatments. Demetra Gray admits mind-body links, but rejects the full biological explanation because it shatters fear-based control.
The claim that there isn’t a woman over 35 sharing this information? How about yours truly! My emphasis is on wisdom, empowerment, freedom and independence. If this makes me a cult leader, then that’s a cult I’m happy to be in!
In the end, this article is propaganda from someone still half-trapped in fear: she believes in mind-body links but rejects the full biological explanation because it threatens her worldview. And this is often the case.
Ignore the smears. Study the Five Biological Laws yourself – they hold without exception. GNM isn’t fraud, cult, or delusion; it’s the paradigm shift medicine desperately needs that explains why conventional “medicine” often harms more than helps. The truth doesn’t fear scrutiny; suppression proves it’s dangerous to the status quo.