Inspired by myself and Lloyd’s current Bible studies, which has made us truly appreciative of the wisdom within the stories and parables, this article reflects upon Biblical teachings as well as fallacies to find a way forward in truth.
Suppression
As you are likely already aware, the Biological Laws are heavily suppressed, and continually smeared with fallacies, attempting to prevent people from believing them.
In our extensive research into natural and alternative health, and politics, as well as working in the natural health industry for over 2 decades, it took us almost 15 years to become aware of Dr Hamer’s groundbreaking discoveries. I honestly don’t think Lloyd and I have ever come across anything so heavily suppressed!
Since 2020, millions have realised that the mainstream is not gospel. And to satisfy the curiosity, many theories have been created, and those that are allowed to go viral appear to serve one of 2 purposes: They either confirm an aspect of the mainstream narrative (such as the existence of viruses, natural cancer cures, etc.), or they provide an alternative that steers people away from learning the Biological Laws (e.g. Terrain Theory). Either way, these theories all have the same purpose of keeping the masses locked into fear.
Even those who have been fortunate enough to have discovered the Biological Laws, are soon met with the many discrepancies, politics and infighting between teachers and those who deem themselves authorities over each other and claim to be ‘officially endorsed’ etc. This can be enough to turn people away from experiencing their paradigm shift (as I explain in the article Controversies Abound)
Lloyd and I often wonder:
Is this being done on purpose?
Are there gatekeepers of the knowledge?
We have no doubt that there are infiltators whose purpose and intention is to disrupt and cause division in the GNM/GHK community. It is not always obvious who is behind it (though there are many accusations by others), as these characters will provoke others to cause the divide and uncertainty, infiltrating with misinformation and fallacious attacks on other teachers. The people who are playing along with this, whether teachers, students or followers, are often innocent and unaware of the effects this is having on the overall mission. Surely they all know deep down that if we all united with the common mission of bringing the Biological Laws into the open, that it would cause an exponential awakening and the official, mainstream narrative would completely fall down?
So why don’t we unite?
We would love that, and have reached out to many others. With Lloyd’s creative programming and tech abilities and my driven, innovative mind, coming together with the complementary talents of others could really make all the difference! But we have hit so many brick walls, even been evicted from some groups where we dare question or start a discussion.
Gatekeepers?
I want to make it clear that I am in no way accusing anyone of this, it is for everyone to be aware of the tactics that may be used, either intentionally or unintentionally. After all, I do believe that the majority of people think they are doing the right thing by Dr Hamer. So I am not talking about underhand and devious tactics here, but the unintended consequences that their territorial and protective actions have on the bigger mission, the way I see it. Maybe if we are all aware of this, we can check our own and others’ actions to ensure we are not gatekeeping, disrupting or turning the movement into a cult of sorts?
Copyright and Forbidden Translation
Dr Hamer wrote a huge amount of work in his native German language, and there is an abundance of literature that is untranslated, and more that is not even made public.
Those who refuse to endorse translations on the grounds that the author cannot do it justice or fully understand Dr Hamer’s intentions, have become modern-day gatekeepers, echoing the religious leaders Jesus condemned for taking away the key of knowledge and hindering others from entering.
This mirrors the scribes and Pharisees whom Jesus rebuked for shutting the door to understanding – neither entering fully into the truth themselves nor permitting others to do so through accessible translation.
Knowledge is not meant to be hoarded; as Proverbs reminds us, “do not withhold good when it is in your power to do so”. Hence Lloyd and I speak out and address any discrepancies or controversy we identify.
Withholding untranslated documents and forbidding translation of those released (or even telling people they need to learn German to read the work) limits access to truth for those without the native tongue.
The concern about misinterpretation is valid, but refusing all translation while accusing others of error in a derogatory way creates a self-sealing monopoly – it is an appeal to authority that prioritizes control over faithful sharing.
Insisting that only native speakers can understand or translate the works commits an appeal to authority fallacy, treating ethnic/linguistic identity as automatic expertise while dismissing evidence-based translation efforts.
The claim that translation dishonours the deceased author by subjecting the text to “transitions” it cannot endure is an appeal to tradition or false purity — it prioritizes an idealized, inaccessible original over making knowledge available.
Accusing all outsiders of misinterpretation while refusing to provide translations is a form of no-true-Scotsman reasoning: it redefines valid understanding as only what aligns with the gatekeepers’ views.
Dead authors cannot speak, but living stewards of their work can choose openness or restriction. History shows that withholding sacred or important texts often leads to misunderstanding, not protection.
Unquestioning and Purism
This purism often manifests as an unwillingness to question established interpretations or to integrate insights from related fields. Teachers who position themselves as unquestionable authorities – sometimes claiming direct lineage or “official” endorsement from Dr Hamer or one of his appointed lecturers – can inadvertently create echo chambers. Dissent or inquiry is met with dismissal, labeling questioners as misinformed or disloyal, which stifles open dialogue and turns exploration into dogma. This is extremely off-putting to students, particularly newcomers, making it all to appear like a cult.
The Bible warns against such blind allegiance to human leaders over truth itself. In 1 Corinthians 3:4-7, Paul addresses division among followers: “For when one says, ‘I follow Paul,’ and another, ‘I follow Apollos,’ are you not mere men? What, after all, is Apollos? And what is Paul? Only servants, through whom you came to believe – as the Lord has assigned to each his task. I planted the seed, Apollos watered it, but God has been making it grow.” This reminds us that no teacher owns the truth; they are stewards, not gatekeepers. Elevating any individual to cult-like status risks idolatry and division.
Purist approaches also tend to reject multifactorial views of disease, insisting that only biological conflicts trigger symptoms. While the Five Biological Laws provide a profound framework for understanding conflict-triggered responses, dismissing poison, injury and nutritional deficiencies as irrelevant factors overlooks how these can exacerbate conflict-active phases and even mimic symptoms of biological programs, and forget the fact that even Dr Hamer himself acknowledged these.
Purists enforce a narrow lens that excludes complementary healing modalities as not required. While the body does have everything it needs to heal and doesn’t require these modalities per se, many have some use in supporting the natural process. For instance, energy work, vibrational healing, or practices that address the body’s subtle fields are often branded as “New Age” distractions or incompatible with the Laws’ scientific basis. Yet the Laws describe observable, repeatable biological processes experienced in the psyche, brain, and organ simultaneously -processes that could harmonize with holistic views of energy and vibration, as the body is an interconnected system, through an energetic field. Is this talking of the same thing?
Proverbs 11:14 notes, “Where there is no guidance, a people falls, but in an abundance of counselors there is safety.” Rejecting diverse perspectives outright may protect a “pure” version but hinders collective wisdom and healing potential.
Similarly, some gatekeepers critique Terrain Theory as a diversion, yet elements of it, such as toxicity, poor nutrition and environmental toxins that affect the internal environment can weaken the terrain, making healing more difficult. The Biological Laws explain why the body adapts biologically; terrain ideas may describe conditions that influence adaptation.
True protection of Hamer’s discoveries would involve humble stewardship: encouraging critical thinking, supporting accurate translations, fostering collaboration, and allowing the Laws to evolve through application and dialogue. Purism that breeds exclusion, conflict, or unquestioned authority strays from this.
The way I see it, all ideas should be discussed openly, with care to clearly distinguish what is pure Dr Hamer and what is explorative discussion, which is important so as not to confuse newcomers.